The privatization of the pensions and the interested journalist

Look at Etxezarreta he has studying for many years the topic of the pensions. In fact, I believe that his first alerts on the topic must already have almost twenty years. The teacher of economic policy of the UAB was of the first ones in realizing the voracious appetite that the public pensions funds were waking up for banks and private financiers, the enormous possibility of speculation that were losing the carroñeros, and how profitable could become for these speculators to turn a few sure pensions (that were removing the biggest retired persons of the risk of dependency and an absolute instability) in a new game of roulette where it is already known that the banking always wins and the poor always lose.

Today, in Public, they publish an interview immediately after his recent book on the topic. The economist declares that "it does not see for any side the danger of the pensions", and he says very sensible things on why it must not be any dogma to balance this account (supposing that it is not, that it is, and many years) when com does not demand the same, for example, the Budget of the Royal house from itself. Look it is shelling, peacefully, the truths to a journalist that it cannot catch it in false, and is splendid because he knows what he says, because he has studying it for years and nobody ever cheated it with these "signs of alert" that the offices of study of banks and boxes to the watching publish periodically to sow the alarm... hoping that with his lies it should mature another fat privatization more.

Well, like the answers of Miren they are clear and round, there is no any more space for the confusion than in the subtitle. You repair what he says: "A slightly conventional look on the problems of the public system of pensions, which for her are only interested myths." If we analyze it thoroughly:

- Slightly conventional look (look at what that one red says...)
- on the problems of the public system of pensions (but he is not saying and does not demonstrating Etxezarreta Looks that there are no problems!)
- that for her are only interested myths (that I consisted, only for her there are "interested myths". How do the serious, conventional people call, to lie shamelessly to throw the glove to our savings, to the safety of our future?)

And this subtitle catchpenny can be read in the Public progressive newspaper. Excuse the machsimo of the language, but I cannot remedy it: Order eggs!

To see also "Europe in crisis": Euromemorandum 2009/2010

Comments